Dave’s conclusion about the implications of this case study could apply to just about any segment of the communications/collaboration industry — there’s no area where technology isn’t disrupting not just legacy systems, but the business processes they support. “It doesn’t make a lot of sense to upgrade [technology] to the state of the art in order to process interactions the same way as before,” he writes.
Pre-pandemic, one response to Dave’s point might have been: “OK, then we just won’t upgrade to state-of-the-art technology, since our processes can’t accommodate it. We don’t need to be bleeding edge.” In fact, deciding to overhaul your business processes to line up with a technology upgrade would probably have been seen as riskier than standing pat.
To see how this is no longer a feasible position in almost any area of the enterprise, you just need to look at knowledge workers. We upgraded them to fairly state-of-the-art collaboration tools at the beginning of the pandemic, and there was never the option not to do so. The upgrade improved business processes by providing a way for people to collaborate face-to-face at a time when they couldn’t come together physically.
What’s been missing for knowledge workers is that the business process changes so far have only gone as deep as this surface level. We still don’t really know how best to use state-of-the-art collaboration tools to make meetings more effective, create a hybrid culture once some return to office is possible, or make sure we’re putting the right tools in the hands of the people who need them.
from WordPress https://ift.tt/3BDlIA3
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment